Підготовчі курси (за програмою ЗНО)
Всеукраїнська олімпіада  Львівської політехніки
 

Evaluation criteria (MSCA calls)

All project proposals will be evaluated by experts, on the basis of the award criteria:

  • Excellence;
  • Impact;
  • Quality and efficiency of the implementation.

Each criterion will be scored from 0 to 5. The total number of scores is taken into account — total score for the three criteria. The total score will be subject to a threshold of 70%. When the total scores of project proposals are equal, priority will be based on scores for individual award criteria according to types of actions.

Excellence

Impact

Quality and efficiency of the implementation

Weighting / The priority of criteria in case of equal  total scores of project proposals

50% / 1 30% / 2 20% / 3

Innovative Training Networks

Quality, innovative aspects and credibility of the research programme (including inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects) Enhancing the career perspectives and employability of researchers and contribution to their skills development Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources, (including awarding of the doctoral degrees for EID and EJD projects)
Quality and innovative aspects of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects) Contribution to structuring doctoral / early-stage research training at the European level and to strengthening European innovation capacity, including the potential for: a) meaningful contribution of the non-academic sector to the doctoral/research training, as appropriate to the implementation mode and research field b) developing sustainable joint doctoral degree structures (for EJD projects only) Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD projects)
Quality of the supervision (including mandatory joint supervision for EID and EJD projects) Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results Appropriateness of the infrastructure of the participating organisations
Quality of the proposed interaction between the participating organisations Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations and their commitment to the programme
Individual Fellowships
Quality and credibility of the research/innovation project; level of novelty, appropriate consideration of inter/multidisciplinary and gender aspects Enhancing the potential and future career prospects of the researcher Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan
Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the researcher and the host Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results Appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources
Quality of the supervision and of the integration in the team/institution Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including risk management
Capacity of the researcher to reach or re-enforce a position of professional maturity/independence   Appropriateness of the institutional environment (infrastructure)

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange

Quality and credibility of the research/innovation project; level of novelty and appropriate consideration of inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and gender aspects Enhancing the potential and future career perspectives of the staff members Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources
Quality and appropriateness of knowledge sharing among the participating organisations in light of the research and innovation objectives. Developing new and lasting research collaborations, achieving transfer of knowledge between participating organisations and contribution to improving research and innovation potential at the European and global levels Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including quality management and risk management
Quality of the proposed interaction between the participating organisations Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results Appropriateness of the institutional environment (hosting arrangements, infrastructure)
  Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations and their commitment to the project

Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes

Quality of the selection / recruitment process for the researchers (transparency, composition and organisation of selection committees, evaluation criteria, equal opportunities) Enhancing the potential and future career perspectives of researchers; Strengthening human resources on regional, national or international level Coherence, effectiveness and appropriateness of the work plan
Quality of the research options offered by the programme in terms of science, interdisciplinarity, intersectorality and level of transnational mobility Aligning practices of participating organisations with the principles set out by the EU for human resources development in research and innovation Appointment conditions of researchers
Quality of career guidance and training, including supervision arrangements, training in transferable skills Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the results Competence of the participant to implement the programme
  Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the results to different target audiences  

 

Last update: 2 years 3 months ago